⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

{{Vptopic |topic=Shared names for languages and implementations |summary=What to do about implementation pages when the implementation shares a name with the language }} What's the appropriate way to make implementation pages when the implementation shares a name with the language (e.g. for [[Inform 7]])? --[[User:Mr2001|Mr2001]] 22:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

: I say that we should just keep them the same for now (for one thing, it's a vastly common case, especially for less-common languages), having the page note that it is both a language and an implementation of the language. After all, this is a wiki; we don't need to avoid multiple-inheritance… ;-) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC) :: [[:Category:Perl]] used to be a shared implementation/language page. I don't remember why it was changed. Excessive category nesting ''does'' mess with the Semantic MediaWiki queries, though. (SMW collapses categories in queries.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 12:16, 3 November 2010 (UTC)