⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

=Why 2860?=


The equations are:
 a+b=X
 b+c+d=X
 d+e+f=X
 f+g=X

which imply that d = a-c
             and d = g-e

when d=9 the only values are a=9, c=0
when d=8 the values are a=9, c=1; a=8, c=0.
which for d=0..9 sums to 55.

So there are 55*55 cases to consider for a, c, d, e, and g.
Fixing b fixes f so it should not be necessary to consider more than 55*55*10 (which is 25250) cases, which
 is rather less than the permutations that some solutions are testing!

The task is to determine the number of solutions that there are, for which I need to go a little further.

X must have a minimum value of d when b,c,e,f=0 and a maximum value of 18 when a,b=9.
For d=0..9 I generate something Pascal's Triangle like for the count Z of solutions:

d=9 Z9 = 10 ->10*1
d=8 Z8 = 38 -> 2*1 + 9*2*2
d=7 Z7 = 82 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 8*3*3
d=6 Z6 =140 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 7*4*4
d=5 Z5 =210 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 6*5*5
d=4 Z4 =290 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 2*5*5 + 5*6*6
d=3 Z3 =378 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 2*5*5 + 2*6*6 + 4*7*7
d=2 Z2 =472 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 2*5*5 + 2*6*6 + 2*7*7 + 3*8*8
d=1 Z1 =570 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 2*5*5 + 2*6*6 + 2*7*7 + 2*8*8 + 2*9*9
d=0 Z0 =670 -> 2*1 + 2*2*2 + 2*3*3 + 2*4*4 + 2*5*5 + 2*6*6 + 2*7*7 + 2*8*8 + 2*9*9 + 1*10*10

Sum of Z0 through Z9 is 2860

--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 17:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC) =Why nearly all write "non-unique solutions" ? = I think the unique solutions are part of the 2860 solutions.So I think calling them solutions is the right term --[[User:Horsth|Horsth]]



There is a better algorithm for the solutions when they are unique:

Take 1 from 7 as d and leave set of 6 remaining
Take 1 from 6 as 'a' fixing c if part of the remaining set
Take 1 from 4 as g fixing e if part of the remaining set
which leaves 2 values for b.

So maximum of 336 combinations (7*6*4*2) to test, rather than 5040 permutations of all 7.

--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

== Some missing solutions ==

It looks like some of the current implementations are missing some of the puzzle solutions. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

4 5 3 1 6 2 7
7 2 6 1 3 5 4
3 7 2 1 5 4 6
6 4 1 5 2 3 7
6 4 5 1 2 7 3
7 3 2 5 1 4 6
3 8 1 2 4 5 6 <-
3 8 1 2 5 4 7 <-
3 8 2 1 4 6 5 <-
3 8 2 1 6 4 7 <- 
4 7 1 3 2 6 5
5 6 2 3 1 7 4

:Re the J solution (reproduced above) Ummm. I think you have a bug in your list generation. Where does 8 fall in 1 through 7? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

::Ah, good point. Careless of me. Thanks. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 13:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)