⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

The PHP example doesn't seem to solve the task in topic (a function should be passed, not an array). Am I correct? Is there something I'm missing? (Some identity between arrays and functions in PHP, maybe, thought I doubt it.)

I moved the page, so to avoid misunderstanding of the topic.

--[[User:GozzoMan|GozzoMan]] 04:24, 25 January 2007 (EST)

:Mostly, I think this is not possible using PHP. I've been using PHP for quite a long time, and I really don't see how this could be done. Nor the use for it. --[[User:CrashandDie|CrashandDie]] 12:58, 25 January 2007 (EST) ::How does PHP handle sorting? I can't imagine a language that doesn't support higher-order functions (or an Equals interface). --[[User:Lhignight|Larry Hignight]] 22:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Can anyone clarify '''ANSI C++''' ? No wonder there's no link to such a thing, as for all I remember, '''ANSI C++''' is the same [[C++]] as the one we have an article for. I'm changing the link, but if I'm mistaken and there is such a thing as ANSI C++ that needs another article, be my guest, change it over. --[[User:CrashandDie|CrashandDie]] 12:58, 25 January 2007 (EST)

:Ehm, I'm not sure to fully understand your point, but I'll try to answer. Briefly put, "C++" is the language while "ANSI C++" (or ISO/IEC C++) is the standard definition of that language (well, they're two in fact: ISO/IEC 14882:1998 and ISO/IEC 14882:2003, which are commonly referred as ANSI C++ 1998 and ANSI C++ 2003, the point being that the ANSI C++ Committee and the ISO C++ Committee usually work together and so the documents are more or less the same for the two organizations). Also for the C language there are two articles here around: http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/C and http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/ANSI_C. The first is about the characteristics of the language, the latter is about standardization, and it isn't specific to the version/year, nor the examples I've seen here around are usually too specific about the version of ANSI C (two again: C80/C89 and C99). I was trying to be consistent with that. :That said, I'm not sure at all that "ANSI C++" ''needs'' another separated article, the two could be merged just as "C" and "ANSI C" could. I suggest to be consistent, though. :--[[User:GozzoMan|GozzoMan]] 12:01, 26 January 2007 (EST)