⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

==Tcl percolation?== Hi, it seems as if the Tcl output does not show a ''successful'' percolation through a 15x15 grid? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC) : Yes. It's random, and around the threshold level where it can go either way. Requiring a ''successful'' percolation is lame. I'll remove that word from the task description. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 23:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

::Why remove that feature Donal? Seeing a successful percolation is much more involving for the viewer than not. Also the other examples have that feature, making Tcl the odd one out? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC) ::: Because it's a foolish requirement. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 09:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

::: I can't see the foolishness of the requirement to print a percolating example over printing an example which does not percolate. Would anyone else care to put their views as well as Donal? Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 15:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I can live with your amended wording ''"Optionally depict a percolation through a cell grid graphically."'' Although I would have preferred to emphasize that if there is no through path then there is no percolation. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 02:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

==Granularity and tries number== The increase of granularity and tries number in the D and C entries was just to make this task a little more interesting. Requiring a fixed number of simulations in the task description is silly. The simulation outputs are similar, just with more significant digits. Different languages as Python and D have different advantages, and the D entry is designed to be faster. If you don't allow a higher number of simulations, those speed optimizations become useless, and using D instead of Python to run a simulation becomes not much useful. One of the points in using a language as C/D to perform this task is to run a higher number of simulations compared to a Python implementation. So please allow a higher number of tries in the task description. -[[User:Bearophile|bearophile]] ([[User talk:Bearophile|talk]])

:SOunds great. Done! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 02:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)