⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️
This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.
If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.
Can we count this as a [[:Category:Programming Paradigms|programming paradigm]]? And maybe get more text on here about it? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 02:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC) : That depends on what is meant under "paradigm". Real-time computing is programming under certain non-functional constraints (time constraints). That makes things a lot more difficult, but that is not a paradigm meant as the most general approach to solving programming problems. But I agree that real-time programming looks OK in this category. Rather the category's name is wrong. Instead of "paradigm" it should be something else, maybe, "area", "field" of programming. --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 07:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC) :: Domain? Or is its application of the term too orthogonal to that of, e.g., document description or expert systems? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 09:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC) : I'd say that real-time constraints are orthogonal to programming paradigm. For example, it would fall under the "Intended Use" column of the [[Language Comparison Table]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 17:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)