== Ready to come out of draft == Ready to come out of draft? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC) :I like it. I haven't seen any questions. I think people understand RPS pretty well. +1 for promotion. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC) :: RPS is pretty easy to understand. I was more concerned about the AI player. I have been thinking about [[wp:rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock|Rock-Paper-Lizard-Spock]]. Particularly, having the same codebase be able to handle both forms of the game with minimal redundant code. That might be doable as an Extra Credit goal. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 16:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

::: That should be (above) ''rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

::: Using proper "English" for the winner (''paper disproves Spock, paper covers rock, etc.) while not being problematic, made my program entry a bit ... bulky. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

::: Implementing ''rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock'' would expand programs into two directions: more abstraction, or more bulk. Abstraction is good, but harder to read and/or understand. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:50, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

== gooder English for winners == I've always played this game with the following verbiage: :::* Rock breaks scissors. :::* Scissors cuts paper. :::* Paper covers rock.

-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:When I've played it, it was: :::* Rock blunts scissors. :::* Scissors cuts paper. :::* Paper wraps rock.

:--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 10:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)