⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

== Implementations separated ==

We might want to set this up like [[MD5]] and [[MD5/Implementation]] just to keep things consistent. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:40, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

: Some implementations of MD5 are still on [[MD5]] and not on [[MD5/Implementation]]. If someone creates SHA-1/Implementation, please move the Ruby implementation from here to there. If I later create RIPEMD-160, SHA-256, or so on, I might not immediately create /Implementation pages. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

== Warning highlighting ==

That highlighted warning should probably go into a centered infobox to make it more visible. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:45, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

: What kind of warning is appropriate for SHA-1? [http://docs.factorcode.org/ Factor's documentation] for [http://docs.factorcode.org/content/article-checksums.sha.html SHA] says, "SHA-1 is considered insecure, while SHA-2 It is generally considered to be pretty strong." OpenBSD [http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sha1&apropos=0&sektion=1&manpath=OpenBSD+5.0&arch=i386&format=html sha(1)] gives no warning at all, though OpenBSD [http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=md5&apropos=0&sektion=1&manpath=OpenBSD+5.0&arch=i386&format=html md5(1)] gives a warning and recommends sha256. --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 19:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC) :: I don't think the issue is with the content of the warning. The issue is with how it looks. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC) ::: Exactly that. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 20:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC) :I just moved the warning and put it in a box. How's that look? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 20:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC) :: Fine. It draws the eye in; it's the sort of thing needed. (We probably ought to make sure that [[MD5]] is similarly marked; I'll check that in a few seconds.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 21:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC) ::: Both now follow the same pattern. Could do with a link to the weaknesses in MD5, but that's not a high priority as it is well known to be be superseded. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 21:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)