**⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️**

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

==What is the intent of the task?==

- The "sum of" does not mean the same as the "count of" numbers. Which does the author intend?
- Second, the description should say "positive integers" if that is what is intended, because there are an infinite number of negative integers below 1000.
- Third, "below" doesn't include 1000, so maybe it should say "not greater than"? Thanks. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 16:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

:The reading of the task where: :* Sum means sum and not count. :* It is taken to mean positive integers. :* Below means up to, but not including. :...happens to have REXX and Python solutions following TimToady's Perl 6 lead. I quite liked that interpretation. If the task moves away from this, could we create a another task to preserve this interpretation? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:26, 14 May 2013 (UTC) ::I've cleaned up the task to be consistent with the (current) majority interpretation. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 17:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

::: shouldn't the title be Multiples ?? --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 18:21, 14 May 2013 (UTC) :::: Current title will do fine; we don't want extra capital letters in it if they're not proper names. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 22:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

::I didn't really care for the Perl6 solution; it misses the fact that you're just talking triangular numbers with a little wrapping. Making that explicit (which I did in the Tcl solution) gives a really neat piece of code (one general mathematical definition, and a very simple pattern of application to the problem). –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 22:08, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I've brought this out of of draft, since the the task seems reasonable by consensus, and the original author can always pose a different draft instead if that was the intent. Also, I've taken the liberty of adding an extra credit for the analytical solutions that scale better than direct summation. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 00:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

==It's a Project Euler problem too== I don't do Project Euler, but I do follow Stack Overflow and one of their [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16553869/programming-challenge-help-python questions] was asking for help for a project Euler question which got me to the site. This task happens to be their [http://projecteuler.net/problem=1 problem 1]. I note that the RC task is worded differently, and it is not clear if Project Euler is the originator of the problem but since I made a connection, I thought I'd share. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 23:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)