Task
Invoke an object method where the name of the method to be invoked can be generated at run time.
Related tasks
- [[Respond to an unknown method call]].
- [[Runtime evaluation]]
AutoHotkey
This object has 3 methods, and asks the user to name one to call. Instead of using Func(), one could use a class definition.
obj := {mA: Func("mA"), mB: Func("mB"), mC: Func("mC")}
InputBox, methodToCall, , Which method should I call?
obj[methodToCall].()
mA(){
MsgBox Method A
}
mB(){
MsgBox Method B
}
mC(){
MsgBox Method C
}
Bracmat
(task=
( oracle
= (predicate="is made of green cheese")
(generateTruth=.str$(!arg " " !(its.predicate) "."))
(generateLie=.str$(!arg " " !(its.predicate) "!"))
)
& new$oracle:?SourceOfKnowledge
& put
$ "You may ask the Source of Eternal Wisdom ONE thing.
Enter \"Truth\" or \"Lie\" on the next line and press the <Enter> key.
"
& whl
' ( get':?trueorlie:~Truth:~Lie
& put$"Try again\n"
)
& put$(str$("You want a " !trueorlie ". About what?" \n))
& get'(,STR):?something
& (SourceOfKnowledge..str$(generate !trueorlie))$!something
);
{?} !task
You may ask the Source of Eternal Wisdom ONE thing.
Enter "Truth" or "Lie" on the next line and press the <Enter> key.
"Lie"
You want a Lie. About what?
The sea
{!} The sea is made of green cheese!
C#
using System;
class Example
{
public int foo(int x)
{
return 42 + x;
}
}
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
var example = new Example();
var method = "foo";
var result = (int)example.GetType().GetMethod(method).Invoke(example, new object[]{ 5 });
Console.WriteLine("{0}(5) = {1}", method, result);
}
}
foo(5) = 47
=={{header|Caché ObjectScript}}==
$METHOD executes a named instance method for a specified instance of a designated class.
Class Unknown.Example Extends %RegisteredObject
{
Method Foo()
{
Write "This is foo", !
}
Method Bar()
{
Write "This is bar", !
}
}
USER>Set obj=##class(Unknown.Example).%New()
USER>Do $Method(obj, "Foo")
This is foo
USER>Do $Method(obj, "Bar")
This is bar
Common Lisp
Unknown methods are called just like any other function. Find the method-naming symbol using INTERN then call it with FUNCALL.
(funcall (intern "SOME-METHOD") my-object a few arguments)
=={{header|Déjà Vu}}==
local :object { :add @+ }
local :method :add
!. object! method 1 2
3
E
This example goes well with the object named example
in [[Respond to an unknown method call#E]].
for name in ["foo", "bar"] {
E.call(example, name, [])
}
Elena
ELENA 4.1 :
import extensions;
class Example
{
foo(x)
= x + 42;
}
public program()
{
var example := new Example();
var methodSignature := "foo";
var invoker := new MessageName(methodSignature);
var result := invoker(example,5);
console.printLine(methodSignature,"(",5,") = ",result)
}
foo(5) = 47
Factor
Factor's object model is such that objects themselves don't contain methods — generic words do. So there is nothing different about invoking an unknown method than invoking an unknown word in general.
USING: accessors kernel math prettyprint sequences words ;
IN: rosetta-code.unknown-method-call
TUPLE: foo num ;
C: <foo> foo
GENERIC: add5 ( x -- y )
M: foo add5 num>> 5 + ;
42 <foo> ! construct a foo
"add" "5" append ! construct a word name
! must specify vocab to look up a word
"rosetta-code.unknown-method-call"
lookup-word execute . ! 47
Forth
Works with any ANS Forth
Needs the FMS-SI (single inheritance) library code located here: http://soton.mpeforth.com/flag/fms/index.html
include FMS-SI.f
include FMS-SILib.f
var x \ instantiate a class var object named x
\ Use a standard Forth string and evaluate it.
\ This is equivalent to sending the !: message to object x
42 x s" !:" evaluate
x p: 42 \ send the print message ( p: ) to x to verify the contents
Go
package main
import (
"fmt"
"reflect"
)
type example struct{}
// the method must be exported to be accessed through reflection.
func (example) Foo() int {
return 42
}
func main() {
// create an object with a method
var e example
// get the method by name
m := reflect.ValueOf(e).MethodByName("Foo")
// call the method with no argments
r := m.Call(nil)
// interpret first return value as int
fmt.Println(r[0].Int()) // => 42
}
Groovy
class Example {
def foo(value) {
"Invoked with '$value'"
}
}
def example = new Example()
def method = "foo"
def arg = "test value"
assert "Invoked with 'test value'" == example."$method"(arg)
==Icon and {{header|Unicon}}==
procedure main()
x := foo() # create object
x.m1() # static call of m1 method
# two examples where the method string can be dynamically constructed ...
"foo_m1"(x) # ... need to know class name and method name to construct name
x.__m["m1"] # ... general method (better)
end
class foo(a,b,c) # define object
method m1(x)
end
end
For more information on this see [[Respond_to_an_unknown_method_call#Icon_and_Unicon|Respond to an unknown method call]].
Io
String literal "foo" may be replaced by any expression resulting in a string.
Example := Object clone
Example foo := method(x, 42+x)
name := "foo"
Example clone perform(name,5) println // prints "47"
J
'''Solution''': There are multiple ways to evoke code at runtime. The most common is '''". y''' (''eval''uate the code in the string y, producing a noun), but there's also 'name'~ (which will modify J's stack by replacing the two tokens ''''name'''' and ~ with the named object) as well as '''x 128!:2 y''' (''apply'' the verb described by x to the noun y).
There are other methods as well, e.g., '''@.''','''`:''', and '''^:''', though these are designed to consume gerunds (pre-parsed ASTs) rather than strings (though, of course, a pre-processor can always be provided to convert strings into ASTs before feeding them to these operators).
'''Example''':
sum =: +/
prod =: */
count =: #
nameToDispatch =: 'sum' NB. pick a name already defined
". nameToDispatch,' 1 2 3'
6
nameToDispatch~ 1 2 3
6
nameToDispatch (128!:2) 1 2 3
6
nameToDispatch =: 'count' NB. pick another name
". nameToDispatch,' 1 2 3'
3
nameToDispatch~ 1 2 3
3
nameToDispatch (128!:2) 1 2 3
3
Java
Using reflection
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
class Example {
public int foo(int x) {
return 42 + x;
}
}
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
Object example = new Example();
String name = "foo";
Class<?> clazz = example.getClass();
Method meth = clazz.getMethod(name, int.class);
Object result = meth.invoke(example, 5); // result is int wrapped in an object (Integer)
System.out.println(result); // prints "47"
}
}
JavaScript
String literal "foo" may be replaced by any expression resulting in a string
example = new Object;
example.foo = function(x) {
return 42 + x;
};
name = "foo";
example[name](5) # => 47
Julia
const functions = Dict{String,Function}(
"foo" => x -> 42 + x,
"bar" => x -> 42 * x)
@show functions["foo"](3)
@show functions["bar"](3)
(functions["foo"])(3) = 45
(functions["bar"])(3) = 126
Kotlin
When you try to compile the following program, it will appear to the compiler that the local variable 'c' is assigned but never used and a warning will be issued accordingly. You can get rid of this warning by compiling using the -nowarn flag.
// Kotlin JS version 1.1.4-3
class C {
fun foo() {
println("foo called")
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val c = C()
val f = "c.foo"
js(f)() // invokes c.foo dynamically
}
foo called
Lasso
type {
public foo() => {
return 'foo was called'
}
public bar() => {
return 'this time is was bar'
}
}
local(obj = mytype, methodname = tag('foo'), methodname2 = tag('bar'))
#obj->\#methodname->invoke
#obj->\#methodname2->invoke
foo was called
this time is was bar
Lingo
obj = script("MyClass").new()
-- ...
method = #foo
arg1 = 23
res = call(method, obj, arg1)
Logtalk
For this task, we first define a simple object with a single method:
:- object(foo).
:- public(bar/1).
bar(42).
:- end_object.
Second, we define another object that asks the user for a message to be sent to the first object:
:- object(query_foo).
:- public(query/0).
query :-
write('Message: '),
read(Message),
foo::Message.
write('Reply: '),
write(Message), nl.
:- end_object.
After compiling and loading both objects, we can try: | ?- query_foo::query. Message: bar(X). Reply: bar(42)
Lua
Don't forget to pass the object for methods!
local example = { }
function example:foo (x) return 42 + x end
local name = "foo"
example[name](example, 5) --> 47
Mathematica
Creates a dialog box where one can type a function (Sin, Cos, Tan ...) and then a second dialog box for a value.
```txt
Input: Sin
Input: 3.1415
Output: 0.0000926536
=={{header|MATLAB}} / {{header|Octave}}==
funName = 'foo'; % generate function name
feval (funNAME, ...) % evaluation function with optional parameters
funName = 'a=atan(pi)'; % generate function name
eval (funName, 'printf(''Error\n'')')
=={{header|Objective-C}}==
@interface Example : NSObject
- (NSNumber *)foo;
@end
@implementation Example
- (NSNumber *)foo {
return @42;
}
@end
int main (int argc, const char *argv[]) {
@autoreleasepool {
id example = [[Example alloc] init];
SEL selector = @selector(foo); // or = NSSelectorFromString(@"foo");
NSLog(@"%@", [example performSelector:selector]);
}
return 0;
}
The performSelector: ...
methods can only be used with methods with 0 - 2 object arguments, and an object or void
return type. For all other calls, one can create an NSInvocation
object and invoke it, or directly call one of the objc_msgSend
family of runtime functions.
Oforth
A method object can be retrieved from its name using asMethod.
16 "sqrt" asMethod perform
Others : asFuntion : retrieve a function asClass : retrieve a class asProperty : retrieve a property
A generic way to search a word into the dictionary in to use find method :
16 "sqrt" Word find perform
PARI/GP
foo()=5;
eval(Str("foo","()"))
Perl
package Example;
sub new {
bless {}
}
sub foo {
my ($self, $x) = @_;
return 42 + $x;
}
package main;
my $name = "foo";
print Example->new->$name(5), "\n"; # prints "47"
Perl 6
Just for the fun of it, we'll mix in an anonymous role into an integer instead of defining a class.
my $object = 42 but role { method add-me($x) { self + $x } }
my $name = 'add-me';
say $object."$name"(5); # 47
The double quotes are required, by the way; without them the variable would be interpreted as a hard ref to a method.
Phix
Not specifically anything to do with objects, but you can construct routine names at runtime:
procedure Hello()
?"Hello"
end procedure
string erm = "Hemmm"
for i=3 to 5 do
erm[i]+=-1+(i=5)*3
end for
call_proc(routine_id(erm),{})
PHP
<?php
class Example {
function foo($x) {
return 42 + $x;
}
}
$example = new Example();
$name = 'foo';
echo $example->$name(5), "\n"; // prints "47"
// alternately:
echo call_user_func(array($example, $name), 5), "\n";
?>
PicoLisp
This can be done with the '[http://software-lab.de/doc/refS.html#send send]' function.
(send (expression) Obj arg1 arg2)
Pike
with [] instead of -> a string can be used to name a method:
string unknown = "format_nice";
object now = Calendar.now();
now[unknown]();
PowerShell
A random method using a random number:
$method = ([Math] | Get-Member -MemberType Method -Static | Where-Object {$_.Definition.Split(',').Count -eq 1} | Get-Random).Name
$number = (1..9 | Get-Random) / 10
$result = [Math]::$method($number)
$output = [PSCustomObject]@{
Method = $method
Number = $number
Result = $result
}
$output | Format-List
Method : Atan
Number : 0.5
Result : 0.463647609000806
Python
String literal "foo" may be replaced by any expression resulting in a string
class Example(object):
def foo(self, x):
return 42 + x
name = "foo"
getattr(Example(), name)(5) # => 47
Qi
(define foo -> 5)
(define execute-function
Name -> (eval [(INTERN Name)]))
(execute-function "foo")
Racket
#lang racket
(define greeter
(new (class object% (super-new)
(define/public (hello name)
(displayln (~a "Hello " name "."))))))
; normal method call
(send greeter hello "World")
; sending an unknown method
(define unknown 'hello)
(dynamic-send greeter unknown "World")
Ruby
You may replace :foo, :bar or "bar" with any expression that returns a Symbol or String.
class Example
def foo
42
end
def bar(arg1, arg2, &block)
block.call arg1, arg2
end
end
symbol = :foo
Example.new.send symbol # => 42
Example.new.send( :bar, 1, 2 ) { |x,y| x+y } # => 3
args = [1, 2]
Example.new.send( "bar", *args ) { |x,y| x+y } # => 3
Object#send can also call protected and private methods, skipping the usual access checks. Ruby 1.9 adds Object#public_send, which only calls public methods.
class Example
private
def privacy; "secret"; end
public
def publicity; "hi"; end
end
e = Example.new
e.public_send :publicity # => "hi"
e.public_send :privacy # raises NoMethodError
e.send :privacy # => "secret"
Scala
class Example {
def foo(x: Int): Int = 42 + x
}
object Main extends App {
val example = new Example
val meth = example.getClass.getMethod("foo", classOf[Int])
assert(meth.invoke(example, 5.asInstanceOf[AnyRef]) == 47.asInstanceOf[AnyRef], "Not confirm expectation.")
println(s"Successfully completed without errors. [total ${scala.compat.Platform.currentTime - executionStart} ms]")
}
Sidef
class Example {
method foo(x) {
42 + x
}
}
var name = 'foo'
var obj = Example()
say obj.(name)(5) # prints: 47
say obj.method(name)(5) # =//=
Smalltalk
Object subclass: #Example.
Example extend [
foo: x [
^ 42 + x ] ].
symbol := 'foo:' asSymbol. " same as symbol := #foo: "
Example new perform: symbol with: 5. " returns 47 "
The perform:with:with:
family of methods exist for methods with 0 - 2 (3 in [[GNU Smalltalk]]) arguments. For methods with more arguments, use perform:withArguments:
, which takes an array of arguments.
Tcl
Method names are really just strings, i.e., ordinary values that can be produced by any mechanism:
package require Tcl 8.6
oo::class create Example {
method foo {} {return 42}
method 1 {s} {puts "fee$s"}
method 2 {s} {puts "fie$s"}
method 3 {s} {puts "foe$s"}
method 4 {s} {puts "fum$s"}
}
set eg [Example new]
set mthd [format "%c%c%c" 102 111 111]; # A "foo" by any other means would smell as sweet
puts [$eg $mthd]
for {set i 1} {$i <= 4} {incr i} {
$eg $i ...
}
42 fee... fie... foe... fum...
zkl
name:="len"; "this is a test".resolve(name)() //-->14