⚠️ Warning: This is a draft ⚠️

This means it might contain formatting issues, incorrect code, conceptual problems, or other severe issues.

If you want to help to improve and eventually enable this page, please fork RosettaGit's repository and open a merge request on GitHub.

Hi Nigel. I will take another look at the task and convergence over the next few days. I would discourage people from adding examples until then. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 21:03, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

The second Python solution does seem to be right. It gives different results than the first Python solution for EKG(9) and EKG(10). Its results for EKG(9) and EKG(10) match those of [https://oeis.org/A169849 A169849] and [https://oeis.org/A169851 A169851], respectively.

• ''"I have modified the task to require EKG(9) and EKG(10)"'' - You've certainly shown that there is a need.
• ''"I think all the solutions will be wrong"'' - Not necessarily, they just need to cover the extra requirements. Their algorithms may be correct I mean. ::Debatable try EKG(any 4 dıgıt prıme). I stopped waıtıng after 20 mıns!!!!!--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
• ''"This divergence/convergence is illusionary"''. It is real. The Python generator that uses gcd is easiest for me to reason about. What it generates next is solely down to the state help in names `last` and `so_far`. If they coincide between two generators then those generators could not then diverge.

::So what ıs convergence ıf the algorithm does not have `last` and `so_far`.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC) ::: An interpretation of the pseudocode in the convergence section. The state of th genertor as well as the value last generated must be equivalent. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 14:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC) :::: There is no pseudocode in the convergence section to ınterpret. Should ıt not be possıble to determıne ıf 2 sequences have converged wıthout reference to the functıon that generated them.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 11:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

```EKG(5): 1, 5, 10, 2, 4, 6, 3, 9, 12, 8, 14, 7, 21, 15, 18, 16, 20, 22, 11, 33, 24, 26